Natan, someone who actually works for a living, pays more in taxes (percentage wise) than someone who derives all or most of his income from capital gain. And that Natan, is a fact. If you do not agree with me, confer with Warren Buffet - he will confirm.

Lina
Tselovalas v zasos tol'ko our new Secretary of State with Suka Arafat (thats her name), if you remember

Regarding Walmart stores. First, I find it very amusing that liberals use Walmart as kind of "boogyman of retail" - probably because it is the most successful retailer in the history оf this country and because it continues to successfully resist attempts at unionization. Are there other corporations in this country that take advantage of governemnt sponsored financing, or is it only Walmart, the most evil of them all? Oops, I forgot, there is also ExxonMobil and the favorite of all times, Halliburton.
Now, would it surprise you that such liberal corporate icon as The New York Times Company recently built it's massive headquarters skyscraper in Manhatten - also using financing assistance from the government?

Da, ya ne prepominayu Mrs. Bush displaying such warm gestures towards members of these coutries. Can you refresh my memory please.

But let's for a moment assume that you're correct and a particular corporation does receive finance assistance from the goverment. Several questions arise - in addition to your comment about local schools and police not getting enough money presumably being diverted to pay for building financing.

Can someone, please, explain to libs, that when people invest money they have already paid tax on it???!!! now if they make profits, taking the risk of losing eveything, they have to pay more income tax????

The construction of the massive structure generate temporary (union) construction jobs, does it not?
The construction company along with many of its employees may taxes to the government that otherwise would not have been collected, does it not?
Once the store is built and open it because of it's scale is able to offer consumers products at better prices thus saving consumers money, does it not?
Corporation along with its employees pays income taxes to the government, does it not?
Corporation creates hundreds of permanent retail jobs which spurs other economic activity, does it not?
These new tax streams in fact are used by the goverment to support local schools, libraries, police and firefiters, do they not?

And lastly, these public/private finance arrangements exist in many states and municipalities, many of them (like New York or New Jersey) for decades have been run by successive democratic administrations. Presumably, these "progressive" democrats would look after a "little guy" and would not permit a big greedy corporation to take unfair advantage of the public finance arrangements, would they not?

Ok, and how does all of this explain or justify comparing an African American first lady to an ugly gorilla in a thread meant for extending congratulations to the new president?

Maria, you obviously failed to even look at the link I posted earlier. It described the connection between the Bush family and the Saudies. Heres a pic, just for you.
********dohiyimir.typepad.com/bush-abdulah.jpg