Unfortunately, the peer-reviewed climate journals are compromised now. They do not have the authority anymore to say who is leading researcher and who is not. They crewed themselves up.
So, not publishing there does not make a skeptic scientist's research less valid.
The non-political scientists keep working on the climate research and they reached the conclusion that it is NATURAL and is not related to MAN activity on Earth.
The issue here is the politics of taxation in the name of saving the Earth. If man is not responsible for the climate change -there will be no excuse to tax people.
What's not clear here?
The EPA ruling that CO2 is toxic -это такой маразм, что просто слов нет.
I'm sure when the political power moves to the other side, the CO2 will become what it should be - an indispensible ingridient of life.
We can regulate some tetrafluorodiethylpolyvinylbnezoyl because it's not natural, but we should not mess with CO2.