GW is a sore subject clearly,
but what about all the other aspects of environmentalism?
what about land, air and water pollution, the government should not regulate those either?

__________________
Человек, который почувствовал ветер перемен, должен построить не щит от ветра, а ветряную мельницу

let me see...
who was the president who created the EPA? - Nixon
who signed the Clean Air Act of 1990 - George H W
environmentalists and scientists should not politicize the subject..
some are very extreme and radical, even militant..would not allow things that have been proven safe like nuclear power and drilling..

so, greenhouse gasses control is what makes us a concentration camp, other gases can be controlled?
wasn't clear air act a 'cap and trade' act?

__________________
Человек, который почувствовал ветер перемен, должен построить не щит от ветра, а ветряную мельницу

Unfortunately, I cannot open the whole article. Thus, can only base what I see in a given interpretation of such:
1. Showing that one of the groups has a bias in their dataset dos not constitute a conspiracy or data fudging, but can be a result of multiple factors (apparatus systematic error, bugs in the code, etc.)
2. Having this paper published in a journal shows the ABSENCE of a "scientific conspiracy." On the contrary, it shows an open discussion among scientific groups.

Рабинович, I know you undergo transformations from one group to another..if I remember correctly not that long ago you were not supportive of Cap and Trade..what's changed?..explain why support it now if you do..
don't you know that the pollutants identified in the Clean Air act are dangerous to human health?..is CO2 dangerous to health?...according to the newly appointed politicized EPA officials, it is...and they are grabbing the power to regulate it without the science establishing it...or do you know otherwise??
you do know that in the email climategate, the lead climatologists were trying to prevent the opposing voices from publishing the peer-reviewed journals...how do you explain it?

Geller, i am against cap and trade.. at least at this point..
i think there is a VAST distance between being against that act and believing that environmental movement wants to put us into concentration camps.

__________________
Человек, который почувствовал ветер перемен, должен построить не щит от ветра, а ветряную мельницу

if you understand everything literally then you may think that's our perception (regarding the concentration camps)...re-read Natan's explanation..
I am against government encroaching on our rights without any bases...I support sound environmental regulations based on established facts...not using pseudo-science for power grab..

We must resist these environmental kooks because the future theyadvocate is a society resembling totalitarian concentration camp.

Are there 2 ways of understanding this?

__________________
Человек, который почувствовал ветер перемен, должен построить не щит от ветра, а ветряную мельницу

Totalitarian regimes or movements maintain themselves in political power by means of an official all-embracing ideology and propaganda disseminated through the state-controlled mass media, a single party that controls the state, personality cults, control over the economy, regulation and restriction of free discussion and criticism, the use of mass surveillance, and widespread use of state terrorism.
yeah, if our government embraces dishonest scientists and activists who manipulate facts and want to regulate our choices using the propoganda...then I agree with Natan...the key word is RESEMBLING

Михаил (Mike) Рабинович
What is the most prevalent "greenhouse gas" on the planet? No, it is not CO2. Not even close. 96% comprising green house gases is water vapor. Yet one more fact exposing this whole notion of "man made global warming" as a power grabbing scam. Look it up.

__________________
Новые фотки - у дочери на дне рождения. 16 лет. Very BIG DEAL !!!