now it's the perfect time to remind that McCain's great-grandpa owned Obama's grandpa..them republican FOX news watchers 8oI

Svetlana, please READ the constitution.. for some reason i have an impression you never really read it.. at least based on the statements that you make.
BTW, the only part of healthcare reform of questionable constitutionality is forcing people to buy health insurance, but even that can be argued either way and it will most likely be for the supreme court to decide.

exactly, slaves were considered chattel- no different from livestock or cattle... what was so unconstitutional about owning sheeps or horses?

now it's the perfect time to remind that McCain's great-grandpa owned Obama's grandpa
---------------------------------------------------------
his white great-grandpa?

I live in a republican district, so even my public school is ok...I teach my own kids reading and math, hisotry, religion - they are way ahead of their peers...FYI, the TV is off - I am reading a book for a change..and you?
I RE-read the Constitution just yeasterday...which part that I said, Михаил, confused you AGAIN?

вот че-то вспомнилось, не совсем в тему, хотя с вашими постами тоже не соскучишься...:-D
"Миша... Миша.. ... Пошевелив пальцами ног, Степа догадался, что лежит в носках, трясущейся рукою провел по бедру, чтобы определить, в брюках он или нет, и не определил. *...:-O
M.Булгаков

Svetlana, maybe it's time for you to read it again.. before you make statements about slavery being "totally unconstitutional" at the time when it was written..

now it's the perfect time to remind that McCain's great-grandpa owned Obama's grandpa

Can we clarify this statement please? I thought his father was just studing in USA?

He-he.... you know, drinking alcohol WAS unconstitutional at some point. Slavery was very much constitutional -- slaves were considered livestock. "It's our (American) way of life" -- was argued in the South right before Civil War.

I don't think you nailed it again :-) few posts below you ridiculed the Constitution because it allowed for slavery (which is an ownership of people), and now you are sending me to read it again as some kinda sacred document in your opinion (dt) maybe I am not the one confused? *-)