why isolate california? Wasn't this world crisis? Our Governor is after all a republican is it not?

As most of you know - California has the biggest budget crisis in the nation..what's it - over 6 billion?? .. and it's not going away anytime soon..don't you, guys, have the greatest minds in the country?? how come they've allowed it to happen for so long???? don't they know how to cover spendings???????

Our forecast of California’s General Fund revenues and expendituresshows that the state must address a General Fund budget problem of$20.7 billion between now and the time the Legislature enacts a 2010–11state budget plan. The budget problem consists of a $6.3 billionprojected deficit for 2009–10 and a $14.4 billion gap between projectedrevenues and spending in 2010–11. Addressing this large shortfall willrequire painful choices—on top of the difficult choices the Legislaturemade earlier this year.
***********.lao.ca.gov/2009/bud/fiscal_outlook/fiscal_outlook_111809.aspx

It escapes moonbats that the most liberal states are in the biggest жопа-s(H) , because once the liberals start the war on the rich, the rich leave the states, and the libs don't have their money anymore to pay luxurious public employees pension and benefits.
It's useless to explain to them this basics. They think that the money for welfare comes from some unanimated object ( like "merilla" in the Barbie Mermaid story" movie(H) )

Yes-yes! Most rich people live in such conservative stronghold states as Tennessee, Oklahoma and Arkansas...

Майк, а что вы скажите тем у кого была работа
а теперь нет? Что их работа было тоже переувеличена?
Я знаю тех людей которые всегда могут заработать
на не удаче других, это и есть капитализм. Я не пишу
что капитализм это всегда плохо. Но есть вещи которые
нужно регулировать лучшую сторону.

I say tough luck.. i wish them all the best in looking for a new one.. or is it government responsibility to provide people with work?
You have a strange definition of capitalism.. directly from my 1984 textbook... i wonder...

Shurik, here are the rules of the game: in order to discuss ANYTHING, you need to be acquainted in the least with the subject. We already had people shouting negative remarks for any reason, just because they felt like it. They were banned. The article sites number of issues to which any normal parent should not subject. At least I didn't find any points that I was against. No God, no Holocaust Denial, No Secessionist/Anti-North agenda. No Racism. No Pro-Slavery.
Another amendment deleted a requirement that sociology students "explain how institutional racism is evident in American society."
To be continued...

If you, Shurik, want your child to enter the world with the view of the world mentioned in the highlighted sentence , I pity you. Now, when our society is moving rapidly towards the color-blind future envisioned by MLK Jr. you want to side with hate-mongers who want to preach America The Racist to our children?
Next time you want to use the term "redneck", read the article, then write. Напоминает гнев советских трудящихся: "Мы Пастернака не читали, но осуждаем!"

Shurik, here are the rules of the game: in order to discuss ANYTHING,
**
goodbye

Liberals are just mad at the fact that they don't have the monopoly in setting up the schools curriculum anymore..finally people are waking up and start changing decades long brain-washing of our kids with the liberal view of America...they say kids better learn algebra than about Golda Meir, and in his own state kids rate 49th in math..so, Meir must not be reason..(ch)
and God forbid we tell our kids it's our constitutional right to own guns..must be much more fun to tell kids how FDR "pulled" us out of the Great Depression .. or not..