Because they know that he's a know-nothing puppet who will do what his handlers tell him to do. The WHITE handers. (ch)

15:11
Because they know that he's a know-nothing puppet who will do what his handlers tell him to do. The WHITE handers.

I like to debate you, Ira, but comments like the last one make me question your, how do I say it correctly, clarity of mind

comments like the last one make me question your, how do I say it correctly, clarity of mind Oleg, I have the luxury to have my mind clouded once in a while: I'm NOT running for an office. (ch)

OK, I read it. Don't you think that if he was a puppet in the hands of white handlers he would be more prepped? And, also, Spitzer was tearing him apart. I also saw Amanpoure interviews, she was even worse. CNN at its best. Foxnews isn't much easier on him either, btw.

ормоны - христиане. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Мормоны верят не в того Христа , в которого верят все остальные христиане, *мармоны называют Христом какого то *парня из Миссури Все основные христианские конфессии отрицают , пренадлежость Мормонов к Христианству. Прогуглай: " is Mormons Christian ?"

And, also, Spitzer was tearing him apart. Oleg, for crying out loud! Asking the prospective candidate for the highest office in the nation questions that demonstrate his knowledge and preparedness to do something about the fiscal mess (in my book - the gravest problem this country faces right now, and in yours, not?) - is "tearing him apart"??? What would you like people to ask him about? Whether he likes coffee with cream or black (no pun intended) ?

Or should we script all the interviews with him? So that he knows what to answer? That is EXACTLY where you learn something about a person, when he DOESN't know what he'll be asked about. Otherwise, it's a rehearsed, staged and scripted performance of an actor, nothing else.

Otherwise, it's a rehearsed, staged and scripted performance of an actor, nothing else <---- Obama? :)

Ira, watch this old one
***********.youtube.com/watch?v=URJUSlfTgGU
Last 30 second, when Hume asks specific questions about the bill of Obama, listen to the answer :)

Mike, we don't know what happened after those few seconds, come on! And let me ask you this: Do you not see any difference between the question about the national debt projections for the next 10 years as opposed to a question regarding specific program in Montana and something in Indiana? Do you not see the difference?

it's not about a specific program :) it's about specific bribes to states, that were highly publicized in the 2 weeks prior to the interview.

Do I expect the president to know what the heck is going on with a particular hospital in Montana? Not necessarily. Do I expect the president to know specifics about the national debt projections for the next 10 years? You bettcha!

Whatever, it's still a local issue, not the national. And a huge difference for me is this: Obama (it appears) DOESN'T WANT to talk about it, whereas Cain DOESN'T KNOW what he's being asked.

Jeanna, really who cares? Do you care what is his religion?
( i don't)
А ты будешь голосовать за Мусульманина , бoлотирующегося в Президенты?

За одного мусульманина уже проголосовали. Кстати, много евреев за него голосовали.

Ira, again.. it was not a local issue, it was in the Bill that Obama wrote.. special provisions for several states.. but hey.. who cares, right?

Jeanna.... i would rather vote for an atheist.. to me all religious people are crazy, just on different levels.

I think it is nonsense to use a bible while taking an oath. Even Russians don't do it. The use Constitution.

"regulations stymied innovation" is a catchy slogan, but Cain couldn't come up with a single example that would support his assertion. then he tried to convince Spitzer that job creation is innovation - which it's clearly not. after which he had to finally concede that he couldn't provide a specific example, and would have an answer for him the next time they met. if you have no specific examples, then why the F is that part of your platform? you guys rallied around Palin in the last election, until she proved to be a dud. I don't know how Cain obtained the degrees that he has, but he strikes more as a snake oil salesman, than an intellectual.

regulations stymies innovations by diverting funds from R&D to compliance. It's pretty simple

GW's restrictions stymied stem cell research, and no one seemed to have a problem with that.

are you kidding me, all of the conservatives (otherwise relatively intelligent people) in this group were praising Palin to high heaven. now you're doing the same with Cain. and once again, I just can't see what you (plural) see in him, because all I see is a slick shyster.

Cain is slick?? :) lol, he is like the opposite of slick.
SOme people were praising Palin.. i did not like her, but i did understand why McCain picked her..

Jeanna.... i would rather vote for an atheist..

Это не ответ......вопрос был: А ты будешь голосовать за Мусульманина , бoлотирующегося в Президенты?

look at his eyes, the man is a liar... Clinton was pretty slick too, but unlike Cain, he's also very intelligent and incredibly charming. Cain makes me very uncomfortable - he reminds me of an ambulance chaser or a used car salesman.

Jeanna, if his views represent mine, sure.
а за Израиль ты не боишься ? :-D :-D

Again, if his views represent mine...
I have friends who are muslim.. and very pro-Israel

"I remain a Republican, but the Republicans have become a far more theological, faith-directed party, not troubling with evidence."
Peter G. Peterson
An American businessman, investment banker, fiscal conservative, author, and politician whose most prominent political position was as United States Secretary of Commerce from February 29, 1972, to February 1, 1973 under Richard Nixon.
Before serving in the White House, Peterson was Chairman and CEO of Bell & Howell, from 1963 to 1971. From 1973 to 1984 he was Chairman and CEO of Lehman Brothers. In 1985 he co-founded the private equity firm, the Blackstone Group. Peterson was Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations until retiring in 2007, after being named chairman emeritus. In 2008, Peterson was ranked 149th on the "Forbes 400 Richest Americans" with a net worth of $2.8 billion.

and I remain a libertarian..
unfortunately my guy will never win, so i have to bet on someone else.

********intrade.com/v4/home/
Mitt Romney is a 66% favorite for the nomination
Obama is basically 50/50 to get re-elected.

Лебртаринаство по моему мнениу *такая же опасная идеология как и коммунизм , может даже опаснее

regulations stymies innovations by diverting funds from R&D to compliance. It's pretty simple Yeah, it is. :-D And apparently YOU can articulate it, but Cain can't. Should we maybe elect you instead?

aside from being the opposite of communism?
И Коммунизм и либертарианство борются за разрушение государства

Anyone that owns a business knows a difference between profit and loss ... Than explain to me why would someone spent millions of dollars to get a job that pays only $200,000 a year? That's a shitty investment either way you slice it.

Communism advocates strong central power...
libertarianism advocates personal choice and responsibility..
I have no idea how u would possibly merge those 2

Mike. Please tell me you not really Jewish. Please!!! You can't be. Its not possible. Your narrowmindedness is astounding.

Who here advocating communism?! You should know that there is such thing as socialism!! And countries that practice a mix between socialism and capitalism survive very well.

И вообще главный принцип коммунизма "от каждого по способности. Каждому по потребности." В идеале звучит хорошо но человек такая скотина что без кнута не оторвет задницу от дивана.

Communism advocates strong central power...
libertarianism advocates personal choice and responsibility..
I have no idea how u would possibly merge those 2
Сегодня 04:10
That what my answer was regarding. I can read pretty good, last time I checked.

and this was my answer to:<span class="o" uid="goToUserFromComment" data-query="{"userId":"nppenvksjnrfxxpueom0qjrmcgkmrbmm sfivq"}" style="color: rgb(68, 159, 27); text-decoration: underline; cursor: pointer; background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat !important; ">
*Jeanna Shuvanni Richards


<p class="d_comment_time " style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102); font-size: 10px; background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat !important; ">18:55
aside from being the opposite of communism?
И Коммунизм и либертарианство борются за разрушение государства




<p class="d_comment_time " style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102); font-size: 10px; background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat !important; ">18:57
BTW , There is libertarian communism, *as well