Lina, I don't want to live in a progressive country anyway. The Indian Supreme Court is plain wrong. Once again, something cannot be a basic human right if its exercise imposes obligations on somebody else. Unless, of course, you support slavery and say that everybody except slaves has basic human rights. Furthermore, the fundamental political principles are unchanging. The concept of natural rights is unchanging. It does not matter how much the times changed and what is being taken for granted. And no, I am not fine with any other term including the word "right". When you beg for money, you should fully acknowledge that you beg. Beg nicely, and I may well give you money. However if you claim you have a "right" to some of my property or to make me work for you without compensation, I will give you nothing. And if you insist too much, I will shoot you - sorry. We cannot get anywhere until you acknowledge - without any reservations - that I owe you nothing. Not my property and not my labor. That's the essense of being free, and I am not willing to compromise on it, even if only semantically.