Показать сообщение отдельно
post #39 Старый 23.05.2010, 16:18
По умолчанию
there was no additionalseizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Hence, the officersdid not need reasonable suspicion to ask Mena for her name, date andplace of birth, or immigration status.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
because she was already being legally detained. they had a warrant to search the premises, had the right to cuff her to secure their safety, and to ask her questions only because she was already legally "seized. they didn't need reasonable suspicion because she was already being suspected of a crime - hence the warrant.
Аватар для Лина
Лина
Senior Member
Регистрация: 27.09.2008
Сообщений: 2,039
Лина вне форума
Ответить с цитированием