Форум русских эммигрантов
Вернуться   Форум русских эмигрантов Форум русских эмигрантов Соединённые Штаты Америки

Ответ
 
Опции темы Опции просмотра
post #361 Старый 10.04.2010, 14:20
По умолчанию
While there is not enough space in this essay to treat of abortion, let me explain briefly that I believe unequivocally, on the basis of uncontroversial scientific facts and a sound anthropological ontology, that a unique, whole, and individual human being is created at conception. For an exhaustive explanation and defense of this belief, let me refer you to my essay entitled: "The Abortion Debate: A Reasoned, Scientific, Pro-Life Argument."
The relentless propaganda to the contrary, dehumanizing and miscategorizing human fetuses, is reminiscent of and similar to the Nazi campaign of dehumanization to justify their brutal treatment of helpless minorities like the Jews. The experimentation carried out on stem cells extracted by destroying human embryos, is chillingly like the medical experimentation carried out by Nazi scientists on their victims.
Аватар для Светлана Гэмм
Светлана Гэмм
Senior Member
Регистрация: 28.08.2008
Сообщений: 2,153
Светлана Гэмм вне форума
Ответить с цитированием
post #362 Старый 10.04.2010, 14:22
По умолчанию
***********.humblelibertarian.com/2009/08/hitler-obama-comparisons-is-barack.html
Hitle/Obama comparisons: Is Barak Obama like Adolf Hitler or the Nazis?
America's Holocaust
So President Obama does not deserve a comparison to the Nazis because the Nazis perpetrated a genocide? Pardon me, sir- isn't Mr. Obama perpetuating a genocide!? He has been accurately described as "the most extreme pro-abortion candidate ever to seek the office of President of the United States. He is the most extreme pro-abortion member of the United States Senate. Indeed, he is the most extreme pro-abortion legislator ever to serve in either house of the United States Congress."
Аватар для Светлана Гэмм
Светлана Гэмм
Senior Member
Регистрация: 28.08.2008
Сообщений: 2,153
Светлана Гэмм вне форума
Ответить с цитированием
post #363 Старый 10.04.2010, 14:22
По умолчанию
OK, Lina, you invited it by posting your comparison of Bush to Hitler. Now, let us enjoy the same liberty by doing exactly the same , but with your favorite president. (H)

Who is this?
He wants to take power during economic turmoil, while promising hope for the nation’s future.
Wants to clamp down on big business.
Blames all the problems on those who are successful, sayingthey’re greedy and selfish and their wealth needs to be Robin Hoodedaway from them and given to others not as fortunate.
Proclaims that the evils of capitalism led to the currenteconomic crisis, saying that the current system exploits the“economically weak”.
Gives speeches where, no matter the actual words or topics,people leap to their feet, yelling and screaming in praise. He usesspecifically chosen words and catchy phrases to excite the masses,while offering no real solution.
Аватар для Мария
Мария
Senior Member
Регистрация: 04.10.2009
Сообщений: 778
Мария вне форума
Ответить с цитированием
post #364 Старый 10.04.2010, 14:23
По умолчанию
Accuses opponents of being right extremists who will increase the wealth gap to maintain control over the working class.
Appeals largely to the young, ignorant, and impressionable population.
Mandates that citizens have a requirement of civil service.
Wants tighter gun control.
Grew up in a country other than the one in which he wants to rule.
Wants innovation to originate from government, rather than from the private sector


If you said either Adolf Hitler or Barack Hussein Obama you would be correct.

( ezineblogger)
Аватар для Мария
Мария
Senior Member
Регистрация: 04.10.2009
Сообщений: 778
Мария вне форума
Ответить с цитированием
post #365 Старый 10.04.2010, 14:26
По умолчанию
And it's not even that I agree with this, but just to show you that you can find all kind of crap on internet.
So, let's stick to the more factual information, like that Hitler was a socialist. Period. And that most tyrannical regimes in the world start with the socialist ideas.
Аватар для Мария
Мария
Senior Member
Регистрация: 04.10.2009
Сообщений: 778
Мария вне форума
Ответить с цитированием
post #366 Старый 10.04.2010, 14:35
По умолчанию
Maria, isn't that what I frequently say to you? not very original...
I don't really blame you... tossing around these grossly exaggerated characterizations such as Hitler, dictator, enemy of the state...clearly just remnants of your Soviet upbringing. the party has taught you well.
Аватар для Лина
Лина
Senior Member
Регистрация: 27.09.2008
Сообщений: 2,039
Лина вне форума
Ответить с цитированием
post #367 Старый 10.04.2010, 14:43
По умолчанию
OK, Lina, you invited it by posting your comparison of Bush to Hitler. Now, let us enjoy the same liberty by doing exactly the same , but with your favorite president.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Maria and then you have the audacity to question my reading comprehension skills??? are you f'n kidding me? my posts were written directly in response to your andSvetlana's moronic posts... and primarily to undescore their absurdity. but thank you for further proving my point.
Аватар для Лина
Лина
Senior Member
Регистрация: 27.09.2008
Сообщений: 2,039
Лина вне форума
Ответить с цитированием
post #368 Старый 10.04.2010, 23:43
По умолчанию
Svetlana, I have a question about abortions:
when all those unwanted children are born into poverty, whose responsibility it is to provide for them? If you guys want to minimize welfare, cut most taxes, etc?
Are pro-lifers ready to adopt all those unwanted children?
Or is the agenda is just to bring them to a moment of birth, and then - despise welfare mothers just like they were despised before, along with all the other poor?
I actually think that abortion, although tragic, always sad, and always undesirable, and preferably avoidable by education, birth control, etc .... in many cases is the most responsible choice on part of families and mothers who are struggling and are not able to provide for those children.
For as long as we don't have a system of equally providing for all children ( since children are not responsible for their parent's idiocy, misfortunes and sins) - there should be this choice.
__________________
Happy New Year to all! Virtual hugs!
Аватар для Khramaya
Khramaya
Senior Member
Регистрация: 23.05.2009
Сообщений: 529
Khramaya вне форума
Ответить с цитированием
post #369 Старый 11.04.2010, 00:27
По умолчанию
For as long as we don't have a system of equally providing for all children
Any policy instituted for the good of all, will lead to over-taxation, wealth decrease, lack of personal responsibility and cradle to grave government!!!
__________________
Global Cooling for the next 30 years!!! - Does not expire!!!
Аватар для Гера Така
Гера Така
Senior Member
Регистрация: 11.10.2008
Сообщений: 987
Гера Така вне форума
Ответить с цитированием
post #370 Старый 11.04.2010, 04:00
По умолчанию
Not for the good of all, but for the good of all CHILDREN.
one needn't look further then a very real possibility of own severe disability at a young age and children being left with very little....
You can argue - well, there are family members, grandparents, aunts,....whatever, however, this is very real and very common situation. I am not even talking about people being unemployed for extended periods of time, or simply lacking skills for employment that pays reasonably well. In those situations children suffer the most. I don't care about able-bodied adults, really.... but children should be provided with opportunities to achieve the best they can achieve - any society benefits from this in the long run. And they shouldn't suffer because of their parent's problems.
now I'm sounding like broken record:-)
__________________
Happy New Year to all! Virtual hugs!
Аватар для Khramaya
Khramaya
Senior Member
Регистрация: 23.05.2009
Сообщений: 529
Khramaya вне форума
Ответить с цитированием
Ответ


Быстрый переход


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc. Перевод: zCarot