FactCheck.org is a non-partisan,[1] nonprofit[2] website that describes itself as a "'consumer advocate' for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics."[3] It is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania, and is funded primarily by the Annenberg Foundation


Where does it say owned?

I wonder if there is an official government site with all the czars and confirmations...

***********.politico.com/news/stories/0909/26779.html
this is what I found...according to this, only 6 have been confirmed..

i suggest your read the factcheck article and not just scan it.
there is also a lot of supporting info.

__________________
Человек, который почувствовал ветер перемен, должен построить не щит от ветра, а ветряную мельницу

***********.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Czars.pdf
check this out - they claim Bush had this many czars, but then list deputy secretaries and undersecretaries as czars...those are not czars - those are positions within the cabinets...

I wonder if there is an official government site with all the czars and confirmations...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
czar is not an official title, so how can there be?
whitehouse.gov lists all2009 nominations and appointments, and factcheck has a list of Obama&39;s czars
***********.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Czars.pdf, if one has nothing better to do, they can go through them one by one...

check this out - they claim Bush had this many czars, but then list deputy secretaries and undersecretaries as czars...those are not czars - those are positions within the cabinets...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
don't they do the same for Obama?

for good fox news programming check out their website - in the morning it's mostly news, in the afternoon it's special programming plus news every half hour...
just to conclude this issues with czars
1. Even if there was less criticism about this issue during Bush doesn't mean the issue doesn't deserve attention now (in defence of Bush, he was intially against the Homeland Department creation and special postions, but then he caved in to the pressure)
2. The quality of people Obama appoints make people vey suspicious of the whole process and its legality...
3.Only nine out of over 30 Obama's 'czars' have been confirmed, at least 15 for Bush...
4.Always a good thing to question your government and their action...kinda slows them down...))maybe....

3.Only nine out of over 30 Obama's 'czars' have been confirmed, at least 15 for Bush...
-------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps I'm missing something about this czar confirmation process... but, Bush served 2 terms, Obama has been in office less than a year...

4.Always a good thing to question your government and their action...kinda slows them down...))maybe....
--------------------------------------------------------------
even better when it's done without ulterior motives and not just to the opposing side...