EPA just said so!
May or may not - is a subject of the debate, not legislation.
Cut on sugar and salt on your own, and do not wait for government to tell you that, or bad things may happen to you.

__________________
Global Cooling for the next 30 years!!! - Does not expire!!!

***********.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1806245/posts
<font size="+1" color="black">The Real History of Carbon Dioxide Levels

there were also very high levels in 1825, 1857, 1945...

as greenhouse gas it's possible that it causes Global Warming.
GW may cause bad shit to happen.
those are only hypothesis..it has not been established..

What?!
1825!!!!
I do not believe it!!! There was no cars then! It must be a joke!!! The data cannot be credible!!!
Did anybody check the air quality over Europe when the city of Pompey was covered with ashes after the volcano eruption???
I guess - the "science" was not around then... he he.

__________________
Global Cooling for the next 30 years!!! - Does not expire!!!

***********.nipccreport.org/chapter1.html
***********.heartland.org/publications/NIPCC%20report/PDFs/Chapter%201.pdf

Global Climate Models and Their Limitations

in a holiday spirit, Mike, to cheer you up just in case ;-) here
What matters more, it seems, is graduates' personal drive. In a surprising twist, a stronger predictor of income is the caliber of the schools that reject you. Researchers found students who applied to several elite schools but didn't attend them—presumably because many were rejected—are more likely to earn high incomes later than students who actually attended elite schools. In a summary of the findings, the Bureau says that "evidently, students' motivation, ambition and desire to learn have a much stronger effect on their subsequent success than average academic ability of their classmates."
********online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703438404574597952027438622.html

Alexei, what do you think of Myhrvold's idea -pumping sulfur particles into the stratosphere? It sounds crazy, but this guy is super smart...

__________________
Happy New Year to all! Virtual hugs!

Julia, I don't know much about that idea - only what I read about that in popular press. While sulfate aerosols do indeed posses sun-blocking capacity, they are also known to deplete ozone layer. I don't know if this effect is significant for stratospheric implantation, but I'd be careful not to trade warming to ozone depletion.
Also, what comes up must eventually come down -- and having sulfur rain does not sound very appealing. Also, I don't know if one can produce a homogeneous layer of that stuff...
So, it does not sound very appealing to me, but what do I know...

yes,this is what I thought - acid rains again...
well, what he is saying you need actually a relatively small amount of sulfur, so the risk-benefit seemed good.
I admire the most this guy's imagination...

__________________
Happy New Year to all! Virtual hugs!

That could be, as I said, I don't know much about that stuff.
Speaking of sulfur, btw. If historical CO_2 spikes have natural (volcanic) origin, there must be a correlation between the spikes of sulfuric concentrations in 1825, etc. The abstract that tells about historical spikes in CO2 does not look into that (or I missed it while scanning that website).